Why my Manjaro only use 1gb of ram ? my Laptop ram is 2gb

Please help me. i just installed latest manjaro kde yesterday, and i notice that it only use 1gb of ram despite my laptop(asus x441s) having 2gb of ram!
the ram usage on system monitor never goes above 1gb
i consider switching to manjaro xfce but many youtube videos say that kde is lighter than xfce now…

screenshot of system monitor
https://paste.pics/0901f0c249d2300a121a0b325e1acce5

System:
  Kernel: 5.8.16-2-MANJARO x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A 
  parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8-x86_64 
  root=UUID=16443972-e129-425f-8bc5-daf89e220222 rw quiet apparmor=1 
  security=apparmor resume=UUID=c9a76565-e8ef-4814-a8e1-22d0f83b684b 
  udev.log_priority=3 
  Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.19.5 tk: Qt 5.15.1 wm: kwin_x11 dm: SDDM 
  Distro: Manjaro Linux 
Machine:
  Type: Laptop System: ASUSTeK product: X441SA v: 1.0 serial: <filter> 
  Mobo: ASUSTeK model: X441SA v: 1.0 serial: <filter> 
  UEFI: American Megatrends v: X441SA.314 date: 04/16/2019 
Battery:
  ID-1: BAT0 charge: 11.4 Wh condition: 34.5/34.6 Wh (100%) volts: 10.8/10.8 
  model: ASUSTeK X441-33 type: Li-ion serial: N/A status: Discharging 
CPU:
  Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Celeron N3060 bits: 64 type: MCP 
  arch: Airmont family: 6 model-id: 4C (76) stepping: 4 microcode: 411 
  L2 cache: 1024 KiB 
  flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 6402 
  Speed: 480 MHz min/max: 480/2480 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 480 2: 557 
  Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected 
  Type: l1tf status: Not affected 
  Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT disabled 
  Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI 
  Type: spec_store_bypass status: Not affected 
  Type: spectre_v1 
  mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization 
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB: conditional, 
  IBRS_FW, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling 
  Type: srbds status: Not affected 
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected 
Graphics:
  Device-1: Intel Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx 
  Integrated Graphics 
  vendor: ASUSTeK driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:22b1 
  Device-2: Realtek USB2.0 VGA UVC WebCam type: USB driver: uvcvideo 
  bus ID: 1-5:3 chip ID: 0bda:57de serial: <filter> 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.9 compositor: kwin_x11 driver: intel 
  unloaded: modesetting alternate: fbdev,vesa display ID: :0 screens: 1 
  Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1366x768 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 361x203mm (14.2x8.0") 
  s-diag: 414mm (16.3") 
  Monitor-1: eDP1 res: 1366x768 hz: 60 dpi: 112 size: 310x170mm (12.2x6.7") 
  diag: 354mm (13.9") 
  OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 400 (BSW) v: 4.6 Mesa 20.1.8 
  compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes 
Audio:
  Device-1: Intel Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series 
  High Definition Audio 
  vendor: ASUSTeK driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0 
  chip ID: 8086:2284 
  Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.8.16-2-MANJARO 
Network:
  Device-1: Realtek RTL810xE PCI Express Fast Ethernet vendor: ASUSTeK 
  driver: r8169 v: kernel port: e000 bus ID: 02:00.0 chip ID: 10ec:8136 
  IF: enp2s0 state: down mac: <filter> 
  Device-2: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 / AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter 
  vendor: AzureWave driver: ath9k v: kernel port: e000 bus ID: 03:00.0 
  chip ID: 168c:0036 
  IF: wlp3s0 state: up mac: <filter> 
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 465.76 GiB used: 18.93 GiB (4.1%) 
  SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required. 
  ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Toshiba model: MQ01ABF050 size: 465.76 GiB 
  block size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s 
  rotation: 5400 rpm serial: <filter> rev: 1J scheme: GPT 
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw size: 185.55 GiB size: 181.63 GiB (97.89%) 
  used: 18.28 GiB (10.1%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda5 
Swap:
  Kernel: swappiness: 60 (default) cache pressure: 100 (default) 
  ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 9.77 GiB used: 639.0 MiB (6.4%) 
  priority: -2 dev: /dev/sda6 
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 6280.4 C mobo: 47.0 C 
  Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 0 
Info:
  Processes: 157 Uptime: 3h 46m Memory: 1.83 GiB used: 1.22 GiB (66.5%) 
  Init: systemd v: 246 Compilers: gcc: 10.2.0 Packages: pacman: 1216 lib: 345 
  flatpak: 0 Shell: Bash v: 5.0.18 running in: konsole inxi: 3.1.05 

No, the title does not say it all. :wink:

Please post your system info as outlined here:

I don’t see anything wrong from the screenshots, perfectly normal. It detects 2GB. If you wonder why it says 1.8, calculate this: 2000000000 / (102410241024). Not all RAMs are equal, some calculates with base 10 (multiple of 1000), some with base 2 (multiple of 1024). Hence exact calculation is impossible. Furthermore, integrated GPU may eat some of those, probably a small amount like 64MB, usually available and configurable in BIOS.

sorry im new to this forum :ok_hand:

no, im wondering why my sytem doesnt use ram more than 1gb the remaining ram is useless then

Your Manjaro install sees 1.83GiB (which is the same as 2 GB) RAM and uses 1.22 GiB of those.

So what’s the issue?

You wanna hog your system? Easy. Open Slack, Discord, VS Code and Google Chrome. That 2GB will suddenly vanish.

Also your system is already using swap

bruh, i already tried that before posting this. maybe i need to reduce swappiness ?

yeah i consider switching to manjaro xfce. whats your opinion ? will xfce run faster on 2gb ram ? im still confused there are many articles and videos that says kde is lighter than xfce now

The responsiveness appearance of a DE can be misleading a bit because of the animations or the way some transitions are made.

From where i stand there are no more differences in that regard. KDE Plasma, Gnome and Xfce are to a point that for a complete DE are absolutely fantastic, and the only thing that makes a difference is the workflow of the user and, in your particular case, a device that has less ram than most such devices have by default this days.
You will actually see a difference with a SSD and probably update the ram to maximum that can handle (from what i understand is 4 GB), but otherwise, not sure if even with a Openbox or i3 setup you will feel like is super fast …

ok then, i will be saving for an ssd and ram. big thank you to all who helped me. i guess this is closed

1 Like