Why I use Manjaro

Hi!
This is not a question but rather a personal experience and thoughts. I’ve read this thread and I was initially startled because I consider myself pretty lazy and far from being technically minded. But after a while I realised that basic maintaining isn’t that difficult (monitoring announcement threads, checking and merging pacnew files). Very often Ubuntu is recommended for absolute beginners but even Ubuntu can and will break (old kernels filling the root partition, release upgrades always had issues). Besides, Ubuntu too eventually would need dealing with differences between conf files, wouldn’t it? Debian. Rock solid, set and forget. Yes, but actually needs too much tinkering after (re)installation. Manjaro just works. And finally:

which I contradict pretty much because basic online surfing is pretty much all I do.

Thank you!

5 Likes

But clearly, it’s not all you’re interested in, or else you wouldn’t be here. :smirk:

That section was specifically written with regard to people for whom a computer is merely a kitchen sink appliance that they don’t want to know anything more about than how to switch it on and surf the web. :wink:

2 Likes

Just goes to show: Manjaro needs minimal effort to be rock solid. But minimal is not the same as none. :wink:

8 Likes

Me, it’s pretty simple. I enjoy a distro that is a rolling release. Back in the day I was a Gentoo nerd, loved it and tweaked to the my hardware. Compiling though became a bit of a PiA and went on to use Mint for some years. Anyway I happened to stumble upon Manjaro, love how they “vet out” Arch and ran it in VMWare for a while.

Anyway while I have only been running it exclusively for about a month now I’m really digging iti. I got myself a System76 laptop and it was so bloody easy to install.

Bottom line, it’s a rolling release and I love not having to do a complete reinstall every year or two ya know. :wink:

3 Likes

A few months ago I left kubuntu because of Snap and the registration policy for updates.

I was looking for a stable linux distribution and although it seems a contradiction I decided for a rolling release, Manjaro is the one I liked the most.

Kubuntu has a life of 3 years, if you start using Kubuntu it is going to be difficult to match the release date, so after a year and a half you will be forced to install the new version with all the changes at once, and with all the problems at once.

With a rolling release these changes (usually) are gradual and give you time to adapt and to solve the problems of the new features.

But the topic of the preferences for the operating systems and in linux with the distributions… they are like the soccer, the heart can more than the reason.

By the way I’m faithful to KDE since 1998 (this doesn’t mean I’m very old) :slight_smile:

2 Likes

1999 here. :wink: My first ever distribution was Mandrake 6.0 PowerPack — I still have the box, sitting on a shelf behind me — which came with all of the usual suspects in terms of desktop environments and window managers…:

  • KDE 1.1
  • GNOME 1 with Enlightenment as the window manager
  • Xfce
  • WindowMaker (NextStep/GnuStep clone)
  • AfterStep (NextStep/GnuStep clone)
  • BlackBox
  • icewm
  • fvwm
  • twm

I’ve tried them all, but I was immediately drawn to KDE, and it has remained my favorite throughout. :wink:

3 Likes

Still… you are probably older than me. :smiley:

1 Like

Undoubtedly. :wink:

However, I was never really a Windows user before that time. As the matter of fact, I started off with DOS on computers that were not owned by myself, and I had already decided from before I ever owned a computer that I was going to run OS/2 on it.

I bought my first computer in 1991, and it came with DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0. I used it like that for 6 months, until OS/2 2.0 became available. I then used OS/2 for 5 years, until I needed a new computer due to problems with the onboard GPU in the one I had.

At that point in time, I had already been wanting a UNIX system — specifically, the x86 version of NeXtStep — but by that time, Steve Jobs had already returned to Apple and NeXtStep had been discontinued “as is”, with the intent of converting it into the successor to Classic MacOS.

OS/2 was dead in the water in terms of support from commercial software vendors, and my friends were all using Windows 95 (and later 98). So I knew I had to compromise, but coming from a genuine 32-bit operating system with full memory and privilege separation, I was not going to install anything based upon MS-DOS on my new computer — a Pentium II with 128 MiB of RAM. So I opted for Windows NT 4.0 Workstation instead, and I used that for 2 years, on a standalone machine, because I didn’t have an internet connection yet at that point in time.

Late 1999, I read a fairly good article about various GNU/Linux distributions in a computer magazine, which covered RedHat, Mandrake, SuSE, Caldera, TurboLinux, Debian and Slackware. Two weeks later, I was at a software shop at the nearby mall in order to buy an Encarta for my brother as a Christmas gift, and there on a shelf were RedHat, Mandrake, SuSE and Caldera OpenLinux.

From the article, I had deducted that if I were ever to go with GNU/Linux, then Mandrake seemed like the most interesting one for me.

I picked up the box, read the description and features, and I hesitated, thinking, “Why do I need two operating systems on the same computer?” So I put the box back on the shelf, but before I had made two paces, I turned around, grabbed the box again, looked at it again, and took it with me to the cashier.

Mandrake 6.0 PowerPack came with a very elaborate printed manual — with grey-scale screenshots — which covered just about everything, from the installation over to the complete manuals for vi and emacs. I read the whole thing through before installing it, and I also read all of the HowTos on the first of the 6 CD-ROMs in the box before installing it in a dual-boot alongside of NT — which required me to reinstall NT itself as well, because it was using up my whole 5.3 GiB HDD.

This was somewhere early in December 1999, and I dual-booted between NT and Mandrake for the rest of the month. I was completely taken in by the quality of GNU/Linux, the fact that I now finally had a UNIX system on my own computer, and the GPL and the philosophy behind Free & Open Source Software.

On the 1st of January 2000, NT refused to boot up, in spite of the Service Packs and the official Microsoft Y2K Pack — all of which had cost me money and a lot of patience to obtain from Microsoft itself. GNU/Linux booted up without any problems at all.

I threw NT off of my computer and gave the whole HDD to GNU/Linux. I was already exclusively running GNU/Linux for 4 months by the time cable internet became available here in town.

I’ve never looked back. :wink:

:partying_face:

6 Likes

I know this is going to destroy my whole strategy of looking younger…but…my first computer was this one:

6 Likes

Well, I was late to the party. I only started using computers by the time I was 27. Before that, I had been doing other things and trying to become a rock star. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

Another faithful KDE user, who started with various Linux distributions in 1998, but Mandrake 6.0 Power Pack converted me fully to the World of Linux. A wonderful journey.

Pat

3 Likes

I too don’t like this Snap policy. Canonical doesn’t seem to give a **** what users think about it. Total newcomers may not understand what is going inside the heart of the OS and as their knowledge increases over time it takes actually more learning. AFAIK Linux Mint ditched Snap altogether and this is probably very good alternative to pure Ubuntu. It doesn’t have KDE release anymore however.
KDE is probably the best DE today. Its customisation options may seem overwhelming but it’s actually very intuitive. And it’s beautiful by default.

5 Likes

When plasma came out it was plagued with bugs and for a while I was using Trinity ( trinitydesktop.org ) a retro KDE, I also tried GNOME.

In the end my conclusion was that better a bad KDE than GNOME or any other good one.

3 Likes

I don’t think one DE is better than the other. It just depends on what you’re looking for. Gnome is nice for people who like to have and see few options, KDE is for people who like to have many options and see some of them. Others don’t even need a DE as they do everything themselves on the command line. Some people have 10 windows in the foreground all the time, others (like myself) mostly only one full screen.

That’s the beautiful thing about Linux: you get to choose exactly what fits your taste. And yeah so does Manjaro and it just works 99.9% of the time. How cool is that?

3 Likes

Yep, been there, done that. :stuck_out_tongue:

I could never like it. I tried, but it just never agreed with me — or I with it, perhaps. :stuck_out_tongue:

I agree, and I was able to get a global menu again — albeit only for qt-based applications — in Plasma 4 by way of a special theme with a companion global menu widget, created by Thomas Luebking, one of the former developers of the Oxygen theme. I believe it was called Baghira, but I’m not sure anymore. It looked very MacOS-like.

Said developer later went on to create his own replacement shell for Plasma 4, built upon the KDE libraries. For a while it was available in the Manjaro repositories as well. It was called Be::Shell.

1 Like