Update ISO request, stable iso are above 3month old

You don’t have to - I use to create a minimal ISO - which is not your type of install.

See the [root tip] [How To] Mini guide to build Manjaro ISO.

This is how the ISOs are build - the optional -f tells the script to use the full profile

buildiso -p <profile> -b <branch> -k <kernel> [-f]

For a full ISO, using stable branch, using LTS kernel, and plasma desktop

buildiso -p kde -b stable -k linux618 -f

If you want the latest stable kernel as of 2026-07-08T22:00:00Z simply replace the -k <kernel>

buildiso -p kde -b stable -k linux71 -f
2 Likes

How about the iso from the latest testing announcement that Phil posted? Did someone test them (the xfce one)?. I am on a metered connection right now, i cannot sped 5GB just to test.

The latter is at least 3 Xfce images, copied to Ventoy, and while trying to boot live, the boot process stops with this message.
(Full Intel IGP machine LENOVO ThinkPad T480)

“Unable to contact settings server
Could not connect: No such file or directory”

I noticed that in the last approx. 1.5-2 months there are problems with the Manjro images. :frowning:

Time to ping @philm i think. This is a high priority problem, i think. When you make a distro and the official images do not boot… not the best recruiting strategy. :sweat_smile:

Linked discussion

TLDR: the xfce images do not boot to desktop with the above error at the login screen, loginng as manjaro manjaro also does not work (the login screen should not even be shown). This is on real hardware, seems like they boot on virtual machines.

1 Like

It would be good if a list can be compiled of which .ISOs are affected.

For example, I had no problem with the recent “Bian May” KDE Plasma .ISO, booting from a Ventoy stick, on a quite recent HP machine.

1 Like

So far the reports are only for xfce isos. Since about 2-3 months.

1 Like

Seems XFCE has issues with plymouth. So we might remove it there. Issues can happen with kernels higher than linux618.

1 Like

Exactly, the first iso i personally tested as broken was with 7.0.
So maybe just remove plymouth i guess?
Maybe it can be tested if one takes a broken iso and starts with editing the grub kernel parameter adding

plymouth.enable=0 disablehooks=plymouth

I am on a stupid mobile internet right now and cannot help much with the 5 GB downloads.

1 Like

People in preview iso topic complained about KDE also.

None of that preview iso’s are working for my new system.

2 Likes

Did you disable plymouth?

2 Likes

Tried that yesterday with the @linux-aarhus mini.xfce, didn’t help.

Im actually just did that on the Live Boot with the Edit option in Grub.

Sadly, It doesn’t changed the situation.

But i could with some heavy and strange tricks, to finally get a monitor signal after 3-5 times switching between several TTY’s and Logged in and swap to desktop with alt+ctrl+f1-f6, logged in with manjaro and manjaro (in SDDM) to get no monitor signal AGAIN and repeat everything again and again and pressing also crtl+alt+f9 to reset desktop and then to TTY again and logged in.

And out of nowhere i was on the desktop and had a picture.

Its magic, thanks to @fredvej in your preview iso topic, who wrote that info.
:man_mage:

I did switched between tty’s but didn’t used any special commands like him with run localectl set-keymap dk… which he wrote.

If someone test longer, its possible there is a clean way to get a picture. Maybe it was crlt+alt+f9? maybe the login in TTY… who knows.

But disable plymouth wasn’t the cure.

/off depends what you store there. A simple grub is 3 mb. The winboze files around 100. If you store kernels there, or make UKIs, with initramfs containing everything (fallbacks), and have nvidia and the driver is also put there with the kms hook, a kernel can indeed take several hundred MB. Quite an edge case i would say. (Worst case - fallback and early nvidia will probably be around 150+150mb per kernel. But you don’t really need fallback so i think even in the worst of worst scenarios you will fit 2 kernels on 500mb).

I think for 99.9% of the cases 500 mb is enough. You will probably only use 20 mb from it at most.

3 Likes

No - it is not plymouth - it is something else - I am banging heads with it right now.

https://forum.manjaro.org/t/issues-with-cost-and-accessibility-for-manjaro-users-in-regions-with-poor-internet-access/188760/47?u=linux-aarhus

Calamares uses 300M and it has proven enough - dual booting windows you only have 100M and that is usually enough - you can even get a single unified kernel to fit into such partition.

If you want to encrypt the system but want to leave /boot unencrypted you should set aside enough space - like 4096M - then encrypt the root.

I use 2048M EFI - because I am using unified kernel directly from efi. For that reason I have - a while back - suggested we make it the default on the installer.

12 posts were split to a new topic: Boot vs efi - and the size of partitions