I don’t know if it is a Vivaldi bug or what but my screen got pixelated when scrolling, watching videos etc.
To fix it, I pasted this in the address bar:
vivaldi://flags/#use-angle
And set these 2 options to ENABLED.
Default ANGLE Vulkan
Vulkan from ANGLE
I have a Freesync monitor and 6800XT. Pixelation was worse on primary monitor. Chromium was totally fine but I don’t like to use it. Other monitor is connected to old Nvidia GPU, Gtx 760. Both screens had pixelation.
This started happening after I updated today.
I fix this.
Look packages for KDE with git or from aur.
pamac list --installed | grep git
I found kconfig-git, but in repo extras/kconfig exist.
Replace this from official (extras) repo and KDE work.
I think you have analog problem.
PS sorry for bad english.
I noticed that the latest Plasma update breaks user icon customizations; all icons now revert to “theme” or “system” defaults. Even if you re-customize, it instantly re-reverts. But I found a workaround:
copy the icons you really want to use to a custom directory – say, “/usr/share/icons/my-custom-icons/”
Use a file renamer to put breve accents over all the vowels. This way, Plasma can’t recognize words such as “hòmè”, “stàrt”, “tràsh”, etc, so won’t knee-jerk to them and revert your customizations (as it otherwise would).
For any items for which you want custom icons, set the icons to your breve-accent icons in your custom directory.
Voila, you now have custom icons that Plasma won’t override.
I installed manjaro-xfce-24.1.1-minimal-241010-linux610.iso and had a strange black screen issue.
I then installed manjaro-xfce-24.1.1-minimal-241011-linux610.iso and no longer have any issues. One thing I noticed is that both amd-ucode and intel-ucode gets installed on my intel system. I don’t recall this happening several releases back. Is this a bug or something new since my system should only be using intel-ucode?
This worked for me. Thanks.
No idea why I had kconfig-git installed from AUR in the first place. But installing kconfig from the official repo and replacing outdated kconfig-git and then running rest of the update fixed it for me.
Minor theme issue: I applied the update and everything checks out with one exception, my Nextcloud Desktop sync client doesn’t seem to honor my dark theme. I think I’ve see something like this happen before, but I cannot for the life of me remember how to fix it. I think it’s QT related?
After every update (and before rebooting) I like to run cat /var/log/pacman.log | grep pacnew in the terminal so that I can see/audit the full path to the conf files that need my attention.
My understanding may not be 100% about tools like pacdiff, but I think it only gives you the option to choose which one survives… and that would be fine if all your conf files were 100% aligned with the Manjaro defaults, but if you’re like me and have some of your own customizations/preferences (like specifying your modules in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf) then you may want to:
Use meld to compare the two files and identify the lines you want to save/overwrite
Make your merge edits (kate, nano, etc) in whichever file is easier to update
If it was easier/quicker to update the pacnew, use a command like sudo mv /etc/package.conf.pacnew /etc/package.conf to overwrite/update the conf file (and disappear the pacnew)
If it was easier to update the conf file, then after you save it just remember to sudo rm /etc/package.conf.pacnew to clear out the pacnew
Of course you can do everything manually with locate, find, sudo, cp, mv, rm and vi or nano in 4-5 or 10 steps. But DIFFPROG=meld pacdiff -s automates everything nicely, takes care of the search, permissions, and for the diff you can even do it in a gui. So no need really to reinvent the wheel
Something new to learn every day… definitely going to try that out next update! Thank you @Teo and @Wollie
EDIT: Imagine my surprise to find pacdiff wasn’t installed, nor could I install it via sudo pacman -S pacdiff… little bit of searching and I have pacman-contrib locked and loaded… I did find manjaro-pacnew-checker, but will give pacdiff a whirl first as it’s the recommended tool.
Pacdiff is interactive. It gives you all the options, overwrite both ways, ignore, view or merge. Just remember that the command to start meld in editing mode and compare and merge is actually View. And not merge. We had a discussion about that, i find it a bad choice of wording, that the merging is done with “view” and “merge” makes something completely different or nothing Not the most logical logic
After you are done, just click save, even if the name of the file is a temporary name, and close meld. That is where pacdiff magic comes back in play and renames and puts the temporary file where it belongs with the right permissions.
Where could I find the pacnew file? It was deleted.
my rust.conf:
Summary
#!/hint/bash
# shellcheck disable=2034
#
# /etc/makepkg.conf.d/rust.conf
#
#########################################################################
# RUST LANGUAGE SUPPORT
#########################################################################
# Flags used for the Rust compiler, similar in spirit to CFLAGS. Read
# linkman:rustc[1] for more details on the available flags.
RUSTFLAGS="-Cforce-frame-pointers=yes"
# Additional compiler flags appended to `RUSTFLAGS` for use in debugging.
# Usually this would include: ``-C debuginfo=2''. Read linkman:rustc[1] for
# more details on the available flags.
DEBUG_RUSTFLAGS="-C debuginfo=2"
Having not used the pacdiff tool/process yet (but familiar with meld), and therefore not knowing if the pacnew is always on the left and conf on the right like in the image kobald shared… post merge you would always want the conf file to be the survivor and the pacnew to disappear… if that’s what happened, then I’d say you are okay (assuming the merge happened correctly as well)
It’s only me that finds the “meld” thing coming out in a pretty confusing way? For example, this is my screenshot, and it seems to me that the files are flipped with respect to @Kobold screenshot (I mean, I think that the new one is on the right side for me, and what will be the final one on the left…)
Then, I find it quite puzzling that there is no “ok” button to exit — I understand that you have to save the final file (but again, which one of them? I end up saving both).
Maybe it is possible to rename the temporary files to some intuitive name and get rid of the strange warnings. I do not know.
(To be on the safe side, I always check the file I have in the system with another shell, so I am sure to know which one is which).
