Manjaro ARM Beta3 with Phosh (PinePhone)

None of the recent builds (2020-12-11, 2020-12-14) are working for me - after updating with sudo pacman -Syyu they halt at boot asking me to hit Ctrl+D to continue :frowning:

I’ve had to revert to the original beta 3 on stable to have a working Pinephone.

1 Like

@AegisPrime Did you downloaded the latest build and tried it from a fresh SD-Card? We changed the way we use Uboot and switched to 5.10 kernel series.

On my PMOS 1.2a Phone it worked. I can test a Braveheart 1.0 and a MJR 1.2b Phone also as needed. We still have to see on how we update the Beta3 image before we can release Beta4.

@philm Yes, I tried 2020-12-14 - I used Jumpdrive to flash it directly to emmc. I’m using a Manjaro CE phone (2GB) - the only thing I can think of that might be unusual is that I applied the Quectel firmware update (I can’t post a link here but you can find it under Pinephone software in the Pine64 forums).

Incidentally, 2020-12-14 works fine until I update via sudo pacman -Syyu - then it breaks on boot (I can’t post the message right now but it was asking me to hit Ctrl+D to continue). If it’s still broken in the next build you release I’ll post the full error message but I’m back on stable for now.

Had the same issue. From my investigation (hook up a keyboard to the phone, login as root, see what systemd says) it looks like the /boot isn’t properly mounted on the next boot after the uboot-pinephone (or alternatively pinephone-post-install) package is installed. I tried downgrading but that didn’t help one bit. I even managed to erase the partition table, but that’s on me. :joy:

@philm If you can’t reproduce it on your devices I can try that again. Just let me know what sort of logs to gather.

I had exactly the same issue, had to reflash eMMC with jumpdrive… I’m now pretty reticent to reboot the phone as I suspect for now it’ll happen again. @philm

Well, we did two releases yesterday. The new image has sha1sum: bed000027733abfa17b064661d0480ad727010ab Manjaro-ARM-phosh-pinephone-beta3-20201214.img.xz and includes all those updates.

I’ll test a proper update from Beta3 to Beta4 as we plan to push this to stable soon. However we don’t want to break userspace, so we have to figure out a proper way to switch the boot process to the new way.

1 Like

Thanks @philm - I downloaded 20201214 a few times but somehow missed that build - can confirm that it’s working great :+1:

WOW, i thought i had messed up since i did for the first time do the dd described in the upgrade messages pacman prints on screen. But apparently it was not the cause.

This is kind of ironic since it is not many days ago i bragged that i have not managed to make the phone unbootable even back when following unstable branch for a long time, and now it breaks on testing.

We are sorry that we made the phone unboot-able with some of our development releases. For the next development cycle we will call all our development images beta5-dev-DATE, so it is more clear that it is a development release.

1 Like

late bloomer here, definitely wishing to stay on a stable branch. I used the ethernet connector for the first time today and checked for updates. Connection seems to work as firefox reaches the net but I was told that my system is up to date by the software app. I was hoping some updates would improve call issues (sms works, calls connect and I can hear poor quality, but the other person cannot hear me).
cat /proc/version tells me I have the 5.9.1-4 kernel, and it looks to have been installed on Oct 18th. I am not sure if this means factory image or beta1.
At this point, to which beta do I want to upgrade (for the best call quality and most user friendly stability)? Do I do such upgrade with pacman instead of the software app (which tells me I am UTD)? I would really like to avoid messing with SD card booting for now.
Babysteps… Thanks!

Hello.

I noticed, the alarm doesn’t work during deep sleep.

Yes, alarms work neither on phosh or plasma in combination with deep sleep. Does anybody know if alarms can ever work during deep sleep? I think I read somewhere that only the modem can wake up the phone/cpu when it is in deep sleep which would mean that you would have to choose between a lesser sleep mode (and shorter battery life) or no functioning alarms, calender notifications and so on. I would hope this isn’t so, can anyone confirm?

Perhaps the hw-clock can wake the system from deep sleep?

Lets hope so.

Does pinephone have a hw-clock :alarm_clock: ?

If not, the pinephone has to get a call :phone: to wake up, to be able to wake you up :bed:from deep sleep. :wink:

Yes, either that or when you press the power button. I’ve noticed if the alarm time has passed and you press the power button it starts playing immediately.

Also it would be pretty bad if when you get a call the alarm goes off simultaneously, you would have to kill the alarm before responding. Could cause all kinds of issues.

I don’t know if pinephone has a hw-clock. Having an alarm is a pretty important function so hopefully someone can figure out if it can work.

same, while using megi’s 17 pboot image. i tried running
sudo pacman -Syyu

then reboot and it breaks both manjaro phosh and manjaro plasma

after updating the os hangs on a splashscreen then loads into emergency mode leaving the os useless.

managed to flash a live img on SD following directions on the tips and tricks thread. pretty pleased with my progress. :slight_smile: That is to say, consider my question mostly answered.

Beta4 is out: