For disclosure, I have never replaced internal storage device before.
The laptop I am using dual boots on Manjaro KDE and Windows 10. I read some article on reddit that says that you don’t need to reinstall Linux when replacing SSD for a reason that has to do with OFC something. I find it difficult to understand because Linux installation is stored in disk, if this disk is removed out of the laptop, the new disk won’t know the content of the old one.
In case it helps, here is the result of parted -l
Model: WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G-1006 (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 256GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 274MB 273MB fat32 EFI system partition boot, esp
2 274MB 290MB 16.8MB Microsoft reserved partition msftres
3 290MB 124GB 124GB Basic data partition msftdata
5 124GB 156GB 31.5GB ext4 legacy_boot
6 156GB 245GB 89.1GB ext4
7 245GB 256GB 10.5GB linux-swap(v1) swap
4 256GB 256GB 540MB ntfs Basic data partition hidden, diag
I see, so the right term is cloning rather than reinstall.
Now since there are two OS’s in my drive, when I clone it using whatever software you mentioned, does it take care of the entire partition present in the SSD (meaning the Windows part is included)? If this is true, then I don’t need to clone Manjaro and Windows partitions separately.
Few months ago I successfully cloned a 250GB SSD to a way more spacious 2000GB SSD with Clonezilla.
Worked like a charm.
However, it has been Manjaro only no Dual-Boot, but a clone is a clone, i.e. everything is identical (except for the storage size of course)
Nevertheless, backing up your current systems before any cloning operation is still important!
For Windows, I always use the free Macrium reflect, for Manjaro a mix of TimeShift on external drive and manual copy of my Home folder (including hidden files)
You can also choose a backup program, but this involves the risk of overwriting certain files in your home folder in case of recovery. Home folder content changes constantly.
For me, manual copy of the entire home folder and manual selection of the contents I need/want to recover is a safer method than trusting any backup program.
This does not matter so much for the root directory. If something goes wrong, I can just reinstall Manjaro and do the setup with my home folder backup. But when the home folder is not usable anymore, hours and hours of configuration work will be gone.
I replaced a 160GB spinner with a 120GB SSD on a triple boot MBP:
connected new drive externally via USB
booted from a manjaro boot stick
used Gparted to copy/paste (starting from the left) one partition after the other from the internal spinner to the SSD, resizing them beforehand if needed.
Had to edit the SSD’s fstab of the Manjaro install that was in charge of grub and had to reinstall grub, if I remember correctly, but apart from that, safe, easy and with a GUI I’m very familiar with.
I’ve never seen this way to clone a drive recommended so do your own research before trying this; I just noticed the copy/paste function when using gparted to reduce the size of the source drive partitions to fit them on the smaller SSD and thought it was worth a shot trying to drop them on the target drive straight away from within gparted.
After some research, I think I will go with clonezilla. I have a question though, practically in all articles I manage to find, you will only ever need to install clonezilla in a live USB. And this requires you to download its ISO image by choosing an architecture in their download page. It’s just that they do not include Arch - they provide Ubuntu-based and Debian-based only. So I looked up in Manjaro repo and there is community/clonezilla 3.35.2-3, which is newer than the stable version for download, v2.8.0-27. I tried to install it and it runs immediately on terminal. You can’t seem to install Manjaro repo’s clonezilla into a live USB. I am not sure how to proceed.
Thanks for the fast reply. Yes I am referring to the page that loads after you click the stable option. As for image writing software, I have etcher already installed. But in order to create the clonezilla live USB using any of these softwares, you need clonezilla’s iso image file. The one I got from pacman installs the program right to your system (as it should), instead of just downloading an iso file.
Yes … so for example you could use Live USB manjaro with clonezilla added if you wanted to.
But those website files are for making a Live Environment provided by/with clonezilla (debian+clonezilla+tweaks).
See for example also https://www.system-rescue.org/
Sorry I am not sure I get your advice accurately. So are you basically saying that I can just download whichever ISO file from that clonezilla’s download page, disregarding the architecture type associated with the ISO file, and create a live USB out of this image file. And this is possible because the live USB will only be used to boot clonezilla which is a standalone environment/system so to speak, and thus is independent of Linux distro you are running?
Yes.
I guess if you care about which one is official or ‘stable’ and whether you like ubuntu might change your exact choice, but yes.
It wont matter for the cloning that the live system is ‘debian’ … as long as the tools work.
(which they should)