Corrupted package during install

[mailmemore]

Solved by using older KDE Minimal Version for install.
https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/20.1.2/manjaro-kde-20.1.2-201019-linux58.iso

Don’t know why. Everything the same as before regarding configuration… 5.10 Kernel also no problems.

Still have to install package sof-firmware manually after install because audio is not working otherwise.

No Audio Device after fresh install

You’re missing the sof-firmware package.

[SlowMotion]

Same problem here with the architect installer. Had this already on another machine and fixed it by hand but I guess its a real showstopper for new users.

downloading lib32-nss-3.60-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst...
downloading lib32-vulkan-icd-loader-1.2.162-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst...
downloading steam-manjaro-1.0.0.68-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst...
checking keyring...
checking package integrity...
error: confuse: signature from "Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>" is marginal trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/confuse-3.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)

Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
==> ERROR: Failed to install packages to new root

I did a Refresh Pacman Keys before starting the installation.

My ISO file: manjaro-xfce-2020.2.1-210103-linux59.iso

Update:
I was able to fix this by following this guide [FAQ] Issues with “signature is marginal trust” or “invalid or corrupted package” - Newbie - EndeavourOS to reinitialize the GPG keys:

pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --init
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --populate archlinux
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --populate manjaro
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --refresh-keys

After this pacman-key --list showed that the key from Baptiste Jonglez went from marginal to trust.

[Falav]

Had troubles these 2 days to install from Architect with different isos (KDE 20.2, Budgie 20.2, Gnome 20.2.1). I tried Budgie with Full install.
There was a package (can’t remember which, though, and if it was the same each time) that cannot be installed and it broke the install process.
Both Budgie and Gnome were installed correctly by Calamares.

[sauravkhdoolia]

Surely, What you say is right!

But i needed a system anyways. I don’t what else could be done.

[helics1]

The confuse problem- I had it too. Just installed it on a Lenovo Gaming 3. The solution was simply skip refresh keys in Manjaro Architect e.g. don’t do pacman-key --refresh-keys. Then it works. When you do encryption, the GUI installer fails on creating a volume group. But overall it worked, the only system what can handle recent hardware.

[arkansawdave74]

Strange, but I’m having this issue as well in a pre-installed Xfce while switching from Unstable to Stable. Regular pacman-key commands aren’t helping so I guess I’ll try @SlowMotion’s fix first. It seems the safest…

and the last command ended in an error…the --refresh-keys command.

gpg: Total number processed: 146
gpg:              unchanged: 116
gpg:           new user IDs: 1
gpg:         new signatures: 47
gpg:     signatures cleaned: 105
gpg:       user IDs cleaned: 2
gpg: public key DB323392796CA067 is 3037 days newer than the signature
gpg: marginals needed: 3  completes needed: 1  trust model: pgp
gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:  25  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1  valid:  25  signed:  85  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 25m, 0f, 0u
gpg: depth: 2  valid:  77  signed:  25  trust: 77-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2021-08-02
==> ERROR: A specified local key could not be updated from a keyserver.

and still fails to update

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 
(239/239) checking keys in keyring                           
[################################] 100%
(239/239) checking package integrity                         
[################################] 100%
error: confuse: key "Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>" is disabled
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/confuse-3.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or 
corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]

I guess I will have to trust it if I want back into Stable Branch, which I need to do if I want my system tray back, I think. (long story here)

[Unstable Update] 2020-12-22 - ICU, Firefox, Removal of Qt4

Sorry for the multiple posts, but the xfce system tray (Notification Area) is crashing again. Just thought I’d let you know that it happened when I opened Teamviewer. I usually have teamviewer daemon always running which is why the tray would always crash before, I guess. But at least I know how to keep it from crashing now. [image] So, I closed all teamviewer processes and tried to re-add the Notification Area System Tray and it was missing from the Panel > Add Items list. I tried to return …

[SlowMotion]

What is missing in my list is that before you execute the 4 commands, you’ll need to cleanup the current keylist. The --init switch seems to not fullfill this:

cd /etc/pacman.d/gnupg
rm -r *
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --init
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --populate archlinux
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --populate manjaro
pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --refresh-keys

[arkansawdave74]

@SlowMotion

What is missing in my list is that before you execute the 4 commands, you’ll need to cleanup the current keylist. The --init switch seems to not fullfill this:

@SlowMotion

pacman-key --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --refresh-keys

This time it ended like this:

    gpg: Total number processed: 144
    gpg:              unchanged: 105
    gpg:           new user IDs: 13
    gpg:            new subkeys: 5
    gpg:         new signatures: 92
    gpg:     signatures cleaned: 111
    gpg:       user IDs cleaned: 2
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
    gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 786C63F330D7CB92: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: public key DB323392796CA067 is 3037 days newer than the signature
gpg: key 1EB2638FF56C0C53: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: key 1EB2638FF56C0C53: no user ID for key signature packet of class 10
gpg: marginals needed: 3  completes needed: 1  trust model: pgp
gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:  25  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1  valid:  25  signed:  86  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 25m, 0f, 0u
gpg: depth: 2  valid:  77  signed:  25  trust: 77-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2021-08-02
==> ERROR: A specified local key could not be updated from a keyserver.

[SlowMotion]

Looks nearly exactly like my output. After that the installation run successfully.

[arkansawdave74]

I tried -Syyuu again. Ended the same.

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 
(239/239) checking keys in keyring                             [##################################] 100%
(239/239) checking package integrity                           [##################################] 100%
error: confuse: key "Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>" is disabled
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/confuse-3.3-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]

[SlowMotion]

Ok, next try. Please disable the first “Server =” entry in your /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist and try again. During one of my installs I had a server that seemed to be not in sync.

[arkansawdave74]

@SlowMotion

Please disable the first “Server =” entry in your /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist

THAT sounds like a good idea. I think some mirrors may be off.

[Falav]

Ahhh yeah that was exactly this package that messed up all my recent tries with Architect.

Before, I sometimes had the Partition too full issue seen there [SOLVED]Pacman "Partition / too full" error, despite available space / Newbie Corner / Arch Linux Forums

I tried - and succeeded - yesterday by dowloading and using old (last version 20.0.3) Architect iso, instead of launching Architect from the latest Manjaro isos (Gnome, KDE, …)

[arkansawdave74]

That didn’t work either …I’ll try 1 mirror at a time…brb.

[SlowMotion]

Maybe your cache is corrupted:

• pacman -Sc (cleans unused packages)
• pacman -Scc (cleans all packages)

[arkansawdave74]

@SlowMotion

Maybe your cache is corrupted:

Could be, but I just installed yesterday after a different switch branches problem… and I’ve deleted and downloaded confuse multiple times. Maybe I should just reinstall…I’ve had a lot of practice lately

[SlowMotion]

@arkansawdave74

error: confuse: key "Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>" is disabled

Please check pacman-key --list-keys | less and post the output of the given key. Mine looks like:

pub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [SC] [expires: 2022-05-18]
      BFA1ECFEF1524EE4099CDE971F0CD4921ECAA030
uid           [  full  ] Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>
uid           [marginal] Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@jonglez.org>
sub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [E] [expires: 2022-05-18]
sub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [S] [expires: 2022-05-18]

[arkansawdave74]

@SlowMotion

Please check pacman-key --list-keys | less and post the output of the given key.

pub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [SC] [expires: 2022-05-18]
      BFA1ECFEF1524EE4099CDE971F0CD4921ECAA030
uid           [marginal] Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@bitsofnetworks.org>
uid           [ unknown] Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@jonglez.org>
sub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [E] [expires: 2022-05-18]
sub   rsa4096 2015-02-08 [S] [expires: 2022-05-18]

Should I nano it and change to full and marginal?

LOL…that didn’t work.

[missi gnupg]# pacman-key --list-keys | nano
Too many errors from stdin

Buffer written to nano.save
[missi gnupg]#

@SlowMotion Do you know which file has the key? I think I can look up there above

[SlowMotion]

One does not simply edit the output of pacman-key… sorry, could not resist It’s not editable because it’s generated from your key list. Wait a minute, I’ll check the options.

[SlowMotion]

Is it possible to run pacman -S archlinux-keyring manjaro-keyring?