Hello everyone, I hope you are having a good time.
I recently noticed that when using pamac even to just check for updates, the system throws an access error with a package called download-aht5DX, this just from pamac. It looks like a cp error. This happened since the update 2025-02-16, I tried to see something similar mentioned in the announcements category but I didn’t see anything, maybe I didn’t read everything, that’s why I opened the new post.
From pacman it throws a warning just from qt6 that the current version is newer than the one in the repo. 6.8.2-2, 6.8.2-1.1, I remember seeing something in announcements but I didn’t understand the solution, my apologies.
The details of my system are already in my profile fully updated in case you need any important information, it would show the terminal output when using pacman or pamac but it is in Spanish and could be confusing.
The details are insufficient.
In case they are needed and you want them to be in english:
prepend LC_ALL=C to the command:
eg: LC_ALL=C sudo pacman-mirrors -f LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -Syu
I had the idea of translating to make it clearer jsjsj.
Here is Pacman’s:
:: Synchronizing package databases…
core is up to date
extra is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade…
warning: qt6-base: installed version (6.8.2-2) is newer than extra (6.8.2-1.1)
…system is already up to date.
Yes.
You have probably used sudo when you used pamac (this is just my thought, not definitive).
You could just delete that directory and then try again.
There are many posts here on how to remedy such situation, caused by using sudo with pamac - which should not be done. Ever.
Ooh I see, don’t worry I never use pamac with sudo, it already asks for authentication when used without sudo ehhe. Maybe when I was newer to Manjaro it did, that was a couple of years ago.
I’ll see about removing the directory and if it doesn’t happen again.
As for Pacman, it will probably disappear at some point in another update, just like other conflicts in the past. I decided to include it just as information, I thought it would be interesting or perhaps useful for the developers if they ever look for information about something similar.
If I where you, I’d stay away from using pamac.
Except to look up things - but not rely on it to install or update.
I do.
It may be an unpopular opinion, but it is mine.
Use pacman - and some other AUR helper like yay to deal with any AUR packages you may have.
Really? Why would that be? I’ve been using it for a long time because it has a smoother syntax and is more familiar with other distros that I also use at work. Manjaro is more personal at home.
But I guess it has caused some problems inside, right?