[Testing Update] 2019-07-27 - Kernels, fpakman, Firmware, KDE-Git, Browsers, Java

I just installed fpakman and it gives me the option to "upgrade all checked applications":

ffmpeg extensions,
GNOME Application Platform version 3.26,
Intel VAAPI Driver.

I never used flatpak or snap.
My question is if I upgrade this will not conflict with packages installed by Pamac? It's OK to do the upgrade via fpakman?

Others questions are: Why I could not check Apps in the main window? Why if I do a search I found no results?

As I understand it, those files it's offering to upgrade only flatpaks and snaps pull from. It's totally separate from anything else you install through whatever package manager you use.

In other words, it's only upgrading files required by flatpak and snap. It's not upgrading anything else on your system or any of the files installed by pamac.

:slight_smile:

1 Like

There's a thread for fpakman if you'd like to ask for help. :grin:

2 Likes

I never mentioned stuff like drivers and firmware blobs. I am not talking about nvidia drivers or broadcom's wifi drivers. I am talking about the non required forcing of not legitimate proprietary crap like snap. I personally do use spotify and discord. As much as I hate non free stuff. But sometimes you have to, right? But I choose to install it. And I know what data they take from me. I allow it to. Preinstalling snap is what I am complaining against.
Why should I have to uninstall something which is proprietary, which isn't required for proper functioning like firmware drivers and moreover which is disrespectful to my privacy and goes against the whole idea of what Linux is.
Of course I can uninstall snap, but why should I have to? If someone wants to install spotify's snap, by all means a good distro should provide them easy access to it. It should be an informed choice, while being aware of the alternatives and the repercussions.
I would still have ranted if they were shipping flatpaks by default, but my distaste would be very less, because flatpak is libre, decentralised, free to play, host and hack on. Flatpak is community based, just like Manjaro. And unlike canonical's snap.

And the moaning you mention happens maybe because a place called announcements, shouldn't have had this distasteful garbage advertising in the first place

TLDR: Snaps aren't essential like nvidia drivers. They are anti privacy, centralised and not libre. I shouldn't have to remove non essential, data grabbing proprietary crap. I should be able to install it if I choose to. And spamming the top of every announcement thread with advertisements is just distasteful

I just can't stand the Titus guy from the video. :stuck_out_tongue:

This is all right here

This "argument" can also be reverted it. Of course I can install snap, but why should I have to if I can have it already working out of the box? If someone doesn't want to use it they can just uninstall it.

People seem to forget that an OS is just a tool. Most people want to do the most they can with that tool.

I didn't came to Manjaro because I had a ideology problem with Windows 10. I came because as an OS it was leaving me dissatisfied, with daily problems not allowing me to do my work.

What I want in a OS is to work and provide me with easy options to do what I want. You can't go much easier than just opening Discover or this new fpakman and simply installing spotify, or discord, or any other proprietary software that you want to use.

If you want to go all stallman Manjaro simply isn't the distro to do it, it already comes with Steam and Microsoft Office Online pre-installed, for example. Just go use Debian or Arch, you won't have this problem.

1 Like

Of course I can install snap, but why should I have to if I can have it already working out of the box?

That's because there's a better more privacy friendly and more community oriented alternative. And by that logic, we should ship every single mainstream app in the repos. Because being able to uninstall something isn't the answer. If you really want me to lay it out. Enabling it by default will lead to more complications. It's creating all these loop devices which make management harder. My point is simple that people shouldn't have to look around to remove bloatware. An OS should provide basic necessities like an office suite and a media player and what not. Shipping non private, centralised crap by default and then justifying it by saying you can remove it isn't the right way to go

I can just as easily uninstall candy crush from windows, but I shouldn't have to. Those who wanna play it, will install it. Just keeping on adding stuff by saying you can uninstall it is bloatware. It increases the ISO size, reduces performance. Makes life difficult to manage your machine.

The inclusion of Snap and Flatpak introduces a separate issue for newcomers: it makes the default installation messy, too complicated and too confusing. See my thread here, I posted a screenshot that just say everything.

3 Likes

This pretty much sums up my experience with Windows :rofl:
I wouldn't say snap is forced onto the users. The Manjaro Architect has the option to choose between "full" or "minimal" DEs. I guess "minimal" is what you are looking for, it's what I always use. It installs just a media player and a web browser and that's about it.
What I find more troubling is that it could become "too easy" for the users to install proprietary software in 3+ different ways and even harder for the maintainers to take care of everything.
And again, making the usage of proprietary software on GNU/Linux easier just feels wrong.

I really think you guys are barking at the wrong tree. Manjaro has been a proprietary friendly distro for years. For gods sake, it ships with the microsoft office online applications, Steam and the nvidia proprietary drivers.

I would understand if suddenly it was Debian doing something like this, but it's really that surprising that a distro that already ships proprietary software is going to keep doing it?

1 Like

My tower seems to get along very nicely w/o these. Just using onboard integrated Intel gpu suits me fine. Ergo, not all essential things are essential...

Try Ctrl+F5 instead of just F5.
It tells Chromium to refresh the page and the cache of it.

1 Like

Your personal attitude to snaps makes you think like that. But again, frankly, every single Announcement thread has a trail of previous announcements and wiki posts just to make sure everything newly introduced -- whether it's bugs and resolutions or new features -- is available to be read and understood, because some people update rarely and randomly and they need to know all recent changes and issues. This is clear to everyone who's been here on forum for a while. So, again, this is either moaning or lack of understanding / forum involvement.

Exactly, I emphatically agree with your feeling wrong with using proprietary software, but that's something which I know is a preference and it can't be expected out of a diverse community.
And yes, providing three ways of installing proprietary software and making default the one which in itself is not libre, anti privacy, that's what troubles me. If and when something goes wrong, the contributors of flatpak have been more than willing to help. That's how it has been for years and should be in the open source community.
I freaking loved unity. But guess what, despite it being open, it was so tightly mangled in canonical's universe that the community couldn't pick up properly. This can happen to both snap and flatpak, but again flatpak being open and community based will survive.

The wiki post isn't distasteful. It is there to check for regressions and see if something screwed up. But the same crappy announcement for snapcraft summit, the same blogspam video in every stable (and others) update post, isn't the way to go. It's unprofessional and reeks of desperation.
Stickying the bugs and features is exactly what an announcement thread is for. By all means make another thread showcasing how snap is progressing.
And on that topic, why exactly did we choose snap over flatpak to be pushed as default?

well none of snap and flatpak are default
they are just enabled no snap or flatpak or appimage comes pre-installed
at least on kde.

having able to install and having it pre-installed is big difference

but well snaps wont succeed in the long run unless we start using proprietary only software.

or canonical can follow flatpak way of giving control of their repo

as i am a Democrat since im born in a democratic nation i dont like having someone have sole control over something.

I understand why you think so.
However, being a long-term reader of announcements threads, I also understand that many of them more or less consist of copy-paste quite recent information, not always accurately relevant, but to my mind, keeping info always up-to-date is not that important for Manjaro team as publishing updates and fixing various issues. Manjaro is not Ubuntu, there's no special forces for promotion and so on. Also, as I said, some people update their systems quite seldom, so it's very nice to have all recent changes described in one announcement thread.

1 Like

I beg to differ, it's right to bark at every GNU/Linux distro out there.
And if you choose the correct image (the architect) you get a completely bloat-free, microsoft-office-free OS that only comes with vlc, a browser, some system maintenance utilities, sth. like octopi, a file browser and only free drivers if you want to.
This is what I want and why I chose Manjaro.
At the moment however the "Custom install" section of the architect is completely broken, so it's quite hard to fully customize your install, see Serious errors in Manjaro Architect.

1 Like

Well preinstalling steam and ms office crap wasn't a great idea either to be honest. I do use steam and I reinstalled it since I started using it, but then again, I chose to. Knowing full well that it is proprietary. People should by all means have easy access and support to non free stuff like this. But boasting and spamming about it and shipping it by default, it is a very very horrific idea and these ideas tend to have implications deeper than it seems apparent instantaneously. All this "welcoming" of proprietary software, it just, it's not right. The whole GNU/Linux system is made up of these communities doing all this work. Stallman isn't some crazy person. Now I do agree that some hardware requires non libre software and there's not much we can do about it. But all this non essential stuff, it should be kept away from the "official" sources.

Forum kindly sponsored by Bytemark