[prince@Bot ~]$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 5.187s (kernel) + 1min 35.480s (userspace) = 1min 40.668s
graphical.target reached after 22.530s in userspace
1min 40s it take to boot
[prince@Bot ~]$ systemd-analyze blame
7.196s lvm2-monitor.service
6.463s udisks2.service
4.610s polkit.service
4.043s mnt-My\x20file.mount
2.910s avahi-daemon.service
2.905s NetworkManager.service
2.895s systemd-logind.service
2.746s ldconfig.service
2.719s dev-sda4.device
2.358s ModemManager.service
1.219s tlp.service
1.106s user@1000.service
1.030s systemd-journal-catalog-update.service
1.026s systemd-rfkill.service
956ms systemd-timesyncd.service
934ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
918ms wpa_supplicant.service
663ms upower.service
619ms systemd-backlight@backlight:intel_backlight.service
568ms systemd-sysusers.service
519ms modprobe@drm.service
518ms systemd-fsck-root.service
507ms systemd-udevd.service
371ms dev-hugepages.mount
370ms dev-mqueue.mount
368ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
Here’s mine but he’s not using arm.
38.706s systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
18.487s updatedb.service
9.165s man-db.service
7.377s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
2.530s nmb.service
1.889s upower.service
1.839s lvm2-monitor.service
1.790s udisks2.service
1.555s dev-mmcblk0p2.device
1.323s smb.service
1.150s NetworkManager.service
996ms polkit.service
967ms systemd-homed.service
965ms systemd-logind.service
891ms systemd-resolved.service
676ms tlp.service
619ms zswap-arm.service
579ms systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service
491ms user@1000.service
421ms systemd-udev-trigger.service
373ms systemd-journal-flush.service
333ms systemd-udevd.service
329ms wpa_supplicant.service
321ms systemd-vconsole-setup.service
307ms systemd-networkd.service
233ms systemd-timesyncd.service
227ms plymouth-start.service
216ms boot.mount
181ms systemd-journald.service
177ms pamac-daemon.service
160ms lightdm.service
147ms bluetooth.service
139ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
119ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
108ms stop-dmesg.service
100ms systemd-userdbd.service
92ms dev-mqueue.mount
91ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
So whats the solution of this?
1.217s lvm2-monitor.service
1.185s systemd-random-seed.service
999ms cups.service
984ms polkit.service
829ms udisks2.service
615ms geoclue.service
521ms wpa_supplicant.service
465ms avahi-daemon.service
461ms NetworkManager.service
443ms dev-sda1.device
439ms systemd-logind.service
415ms ModemManager.service
273ms systemd-journal-flush.service
244ms accounts-daemon.service
207ms lightdm.service
170ms systemd-udevd.service
162ms tlp.service
161ms user@1000.service
107ms add-autologin-group.service
80ms systemd-udev-trigger.service
79ms lm_sensors.service
72ms upower.service
64ms systemd-journald.service
56ms modprobe@drm.service
42ms colord.service
37ms systemd-remount-fs.service
29ms systemd-user-sessions.service
28ms alsa-restore.service
26ms systemd-modules-load.service
26ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
25ms modprobe@fuse.service
24ms systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-826362bc\x2de4dd\x2d4a91\x2da2f8\x2d840>
23ms systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service
20ms linux-module-cleanup.service
20ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
19ms ufw.service
19ms systemd-binfmt.service
17ms dev-hugepages.mount
16ms dev-mqueue.mount
15ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
15ms sys-kernel-tracing.mount
14ms systemd-sysctl.service
14ms kmod-static-nodes.service
13ms modprobe@configfs.service
6ms proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc.mount
6ms user-runtime-dir@1000.service
6ms home.mount
5ms systemd-update-utmp.service
5ms rtkit-daemon.service
2ms tmp.mount
2ms sys-kernel-config.mount
2ms sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount
I’m complain about speed…
Maybe you should move into 2021 then, which is where the rest of us reside. 
KDE Plasma is no heavier on resources and no slower than XFCE. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t any more lightweight desktop environments out there ─ e.g. LXDE ─ but it’s also a far cry from saying that KDE Plasma would be the heaviest.
To date, the heaviest among the desktop environments is GNOME, and that has already been the case since GNOME 3 was released.
1 Like
The splash screen in Plasma can be disabled.
Not on my system.
How lame KDE really is can be seen when you install 2 older and absolutely identical PCs with XFXE and KDE. KDE in the standard installation takes more than twice as long to start and shutdown as the standard XFCE installation. Even if all KDE desktop effects and services are turned off, it still feels on older PCs like a race between wheelchair and roller skate. Pay attention to the hard disk activity when KDE is still shoveling data after logging in while XFCE has already finished. What shell I think if it is said that KDE is actually not slower than XFCE and I and my colleagues watch this spectacle on several PCs every day. I would agree if you said that the difference on modern PCs is no longer so awesome noticeable …
Takes around 5 seconds here to boot and that because of optimus manager (not default), yeah totally… 
1 Like
okay i’ve removed my posts, now you can help the op speed up his slow kde install, cause he thinks it’s slow.
have at it.
The machines I am reporting on are all about Lenovo W530 i7 with SSD and 16 GB RAM and Docking Station and also run with the Optimus Manager qt. XFCE to log in in 4.3 seconds, KDE in 7.2 seconds. Softmaker Office Pro needs felt twice the time to open an advertising document with graphics on KDE as it does under XFCE. If KDE didn’t support our external screens better than XFCE, we would have thrown it out long ago from our 7 remaining KDE machines. Sorry for my clear words