Manjaro-specific packages which need an update

development
package
manjaro

#226

Wrong section @acutbal, this is for packages built by Manjaro team, for VLC 3 is the usual flow of updates


#227

Ops… I’m apologizes… :smirk: Thank you very much for the tip!! :grin:


#228

3 posts were split to a new topic: How to identify a package’s origin?


How to identify a package's origin?
#229

@Ste74 Please update:
toxcore from 0.1.11-2 to 0.2.0
qtox from 1.13.0-2 to 1.14.1

Thanks


#230

Both pkgs comes from arch linux i.e. are maintained by arch :wink:


#231

@comunity see here How to identify a package's origin?


@novocaine Time to change title to “Packages built by Manjaro Team” and post that link at the top?


#232

Done.


#234

Hi, i noticed ‘yay’ package is out of date, also ‘pacaur’ package could be removed from the repo and swapped with ‘trizen’ package - pacaur isn’t suppported anymore and ‘pacui’ and ‘octopi’ apps are supporting trizen


#235

5.608 is now in unstable (and x32-stable).


#236

Fedora released a new version of gnome-terminal. It is now at version 3.28.1.

@oberon can you build the new version of gnome-terminal-fedora and make it available in the community repo? The packages vte3-notification and vte-notification-common probably needs an update too.


#237

Thanks. Updated on unstable branch now.


#238

Hi guys
jak and ms-online new version available @oberon @Ste74 @philm @jonathon

jade-dashboard will be broken until i fix it.


#239

python-jade-application-kit needs a rebuild


#240

Any chance to update gimp-devel to latest rc2 release?


#241

@codesardine done. v1.2.1 is on unstable.

@AV_Aca @philm why do we have gimp-devel in the repos at all? Is it not sufficient to have it in the AUR for who really needs it?


#243

Got it, thanks for the link.


#244

How about we at least wait for their ‘stable’ devel release 2.10 ?
Or are there any specific new features people are craving for?


#245

a week ago, i have updated the PKGBUILD file for pacui to build version 1.10. the change was accepted by phil:

but there is still version 1.9.2 of pacui in the community repositories in the unstable branch.
is there something wrong with the PKGBUILD file or does @Ste74 need to rebuild pacui with the new PKGBUILD file?


#246

Yep… I think i forgot this since i don’t merged it…
:sweat_smile: build it soon possible…


#247

done! :slight_smile: @Ste74