Yes, as was inferred by the word sacrifice. Iâll come back to this when I have an opportunity, that is, if the OP isnât further confused by differing opinions in the meantime.
Enjoy Xmas, if thatâs something you do. Cheers.
Yes, as was inferred by the word sacrifice. Iâll come back to this when I have an opportunity, that is, if the OP isnât further confused by differing opinions in the meantime.
Enjoy Xmas, if thatâs something you do. Cheers.
So wie are talking about sda5 right? That is Manjaro?
Usually grub can find the partition which flagged with bios_grub
. That one can also be at the end, but maybe the UEFI needs that.
GPT can have up 128 primary partitions. No need for LBA.
Well then stay with it and limit yourself.
I hear you, but note that even if you run in compatibility mode on a UEFI, it is still UEFI, only with a BIOS emulation. Its like starting a PSX emulator, instead of running real hardware.
Yeah he should limit himself⌠and archive the full experience with possible dangerous Voltage changes from Drivers? /sarcasm off
German AMD issue Topic:
To me it seems you are booting from the mbr on the B disk, even if the manjaro is on the gpt A disk. That is why there is no uefi esp on the A disk.
I do have a running Manjaro installation and donât want to reinstall Manjaro.
I do not want to scarify any disk either. That is why I ask before I do something stupid.
I want to use BIOS not EFI.
Assuming I can create a partition like that (I cannot try right now because I wouldnât have enough time for troubleshooting).
Would the next command write automatically to this partition?
It feels so dangerous running a command on an entire disk. What would that command do if it does not find a partition like mentioned above?
If that command worked and I did
grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
Would this be sufficient? Or do I have to do something else? Would this do anything to the other disk?
Thanks for the help already.
Keep it calm. The whole topic you linked is 100% Windows related.
Yes it is⌠and? The Situation is still no differend, a application/driver/virus under OS (if its Linux or Windows, doesnât matter) has FULL Access to your UEFI settings and this is my Point and is a true fact.
There are FEATURES in Hardware today, that otherâs would call it bug or issue.
Happy Xmas everyone
Only one MBR can be written per disk. And Grub is smart enough to detect MSDOS and GPT. In case of GPT it will write to bios_grub partition, if not there, it will fail.
Anyway⌠if you donât have time, then donât change it. Reinstaling is needed when Manjaroâs grub manages booting.
The command above: sdy will be sdb in your case.
Itâs your choice, of course; albeit the wrong choice, in my opinion. If your machine is UEFI-capable, and with the Windows installation already on a GPT partitioned drive, going fully UEFI seems like a no-brainer as is often said.
However, I wonât attempt to dissuade you; there are already too many competing opinions in the thread.
Good luck.
This topic has been created to address such doubts
Thanks a lot. This is helpful.
lsblk -o path,pttype,parttypename | grep -e 'dos' -e 'BIOS'
/dev/sdb dos
/dev/sdb1 dos HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb2 dos HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb3 dos W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sdb4 dos Compaq diagnostics
/dev/sdb5 dos HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sdb6 dos Linux
/dev/sdb7 dos Linux s
This is the output of the command. If I interpret the results correctly I have an mbr system. So no need to have a new partition because it is written to the mbr?
I think I never changed something about grub when I put the hd in the laptop. I just changed the boot order. It is set to the samsung HD (sdb).
If that device /dev/sdb/ is the first in your firmware boot order then MBR would be in that deviceâs MBR.
Assuming the above is correct - this would be the command to sync the disk grub with the new version
grub-install --target=i386-pc --recheck /dev/sdb
Also see Install-grub: a new way to keep your EFI/MBR in-sync with grub package
This topic was automatically closed 3 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.