Cannot update, everything fails to satisfy dependencies

[soundofthunder]

Looking back through this thread, I notice:

@blazini36

Fortunately I was Googling around and trying stuff and I managed to get the update to run through pamac, unfortunately I didn’t pay much attention to exactly what fixed it.

Does this statement suggest that your issue is solved?

If so, please mark a post as the solution, so that this thread may receive some well-earned closure.

Cheers.

[linux-aarhus]

@soundofthunder

please mark a post as the solution, so that this thread may receive some well-earned closure

Technically - Cannot update, everything fails to satisfy dependencies - #2 by BG405 is the answer.

Everything after that is just elaboration on the consequences of adding custom packages into the mix.

:: ... breaks dependency ... required by avidemux-core-git
:: ... breaks dependency ... required by avidemux-qt5-git

No matter how many but’s, if’s and elaboration from @blazini36 changes that fact.

One can boil it down to this when dealing with a lot of custom (foregin) packages

pamac list --foreign -q > ~/custom-pkglist.txt
pamac remove $(cat ~/custom-pkglist.txt)
pamac upgrade
pamac build $(cat ~/custom-pkglist.txt)

[Kobold]

@blazini36

That one’s slightly confusing, if you look at the output posted in the OP, that’s exactly what I ran?

It was a general discussion, I wrote They (People who wanted to update and had important AUR Packages that could mess around in the boot or update process)… i wasn’t quoting or replying directly to you.

Because i have no idea how to solve your problem, sry.

If you want a blind guess… then create a timeshift snapshot and delete all related AUR files or change to unstable branch.

[soundofthunder]

@linux-aarhus

Technically - Cannot update, everything fails to satisfy dependencies - #2 by BG405 is the answer.

Everything after that is just elaboration on the consequences of adding custom packages into the mix.

I agree. I’ll take the liberty of marking this thread as solved.

I had hoped the OP might take some action themselves, but as often happens, they have not. This only leaves behind a meandering mess of miscommunication.

Naturally, if a substantial reason can be demonstrated that the post from @BG405 should not be marked the solution, this can be changed.

[blazini36]

Lol just delete the thread, this is painful

[anon33601770]

potentially embarrassing for the OP might be a better assessment - in my opinion

[soundofthunder]

@anon33601770

potentially embarrassing for the OP might be a better assessment - in my opinion

Just another who thinks that forum rules and guidelines are for everyone else, but not them, I suppose.

Perhaps we should “LOL” and delete every thread they create, just to ease their pain.

[nikgnomic]

@blazini36

I’m also not sure how this turned into a discussion about pamac, I only mentioned that I tried using pamac after pacman failed

Some users hate pamac and were probably reacting to comment about installing via pamac

@blazini36

Lol just delete the thread, this is painful

If this topic was deleted, your other topic that falsely accuses moderators of marking this topic as solved
would have no context.

I have removed solution marking but not removed the timer to close topic
But I could close both topics immediately if you prefer